Re:The Ancient Secrets of Computer Vision: The Evolution of ...
by GuiA on Friday May 03, 2019 @12:58PM
(#19820097)
I don’t understand how it is a point of contention for people arguing for intelligent design. Wouldn’t it fall in the same category as questions like “if God is so good why are there wars and poverty”, where the answer is “to your feeble human mind it would seem like a design flaw, but God knows everything and everything He does is perfect but because you’re not God you can’t understand his brilliance”?
Re:The Ancient Secrets of Computer Vision: The Evolution of ...
by NotSammyHagar on Friday May 03, 2019 @04:02PM
(#19821754)
I think so. Another way to say this is "if you think you observed a flaw in humans, it's by definition not a flaw cause god doesn't do those". Like heart attacks, childhood brain cancer, blind-spot in our eyes.
Re:The Ancient Secrets of Computer Vision: The Evolution of ...
by apoph3nia on Saturday May 04, 2019 @12:39PM
(#19827522)
Reminds me of that octo-human hybrid imprisoned in a robot that looks like a giant walking smartphone from "Twenty-First Century in Twenty-One Words or Less":
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hqhjRSSvrKk/WgulKWrSrpI/AAAAAAAAW...
Re:The Ancient Secrets of Computer Vision: The Evolution of ...
by lurquer on Friday May 03, 2019 @09:39PM
(#19823729)
>Cephalod eyes evolved differently so don't have this problem
What exactly is the ‘problem’? How is your vision adversly effected by this layout? Or, are you just arguing about aesthetics?
This "design flaw", i.e. placing wiring (nerves) in front of detectors (retina) is interesting and has been discussed at length (e.g. https://www.quora.com/Is-Dawkins-right-about-the-human-eye-b...), because it is point of contention for people arguing for Intelligent Design. Cephalod eyes evolved differently so don't have this problem (impossible not to feel a bit jealousy for this, like the randomized gradient decent optimization designed by your colleague converging on a much better solution than yours :-)