Their response was "This isn't an emergency. We don't have the resources to follow this up. I hope you have home insurance".
"Press 1 for a burglary crime number... press 2 for a theft from the person, for example a mobile phone... press 3 for the loss of an item..."
Option nine is "Minor assault against the person".
The non-emergency number (101) just give you the phone number for the automated service...
Did I mention it's a premium-rate number?
I earn to benefit from these tax cuts, and I still think that decision was beyond ludicrous - as does everyone else I know who is set to gain from it. It truly baffles me that we're approaching a period of increasing poverty, where crime will inevitably rise, and the police are getting gutted like this.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/30/budget-incom...
[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rates-and-allowan...
[3] https://fullfact.org/crime/police-funding-england-and-wales/
I hope you weren't calling 999 - 101 would have been the appropriate number.
"You haven't lost anything, there's nothing to investigate."
"That's a civil matter. You need to get a solicitor."
"Go away or we'll charge you with wasting police time."