Re:Assange arrested in London (BBC)
by mike-cardwell on Tuesday December 07, 2010 @10:15AM
(#1979248)
I keep reading that the sex was consensual and that it's the fact he didn't use protection that made it a crime. I don't really understand how this can be the case though, but it seems to be all over the place if you google it. Sweden must have a very strange law.
I scoured the web and read a bit about the case. It seems that one of the "victims" isn't complaining, though the 2nd is.
I'm not going to play PI, but it seems to me that if a woman is that upset after sex, then something went wrong. Maybe he refused to spoon.
Re:Assange arrested in London (BBC)
by mike-cardwell on Tuesday December 07, 2010 @11:28AM
(#1979505)
Whatever it was, it doesn't sound like anything which could be classified as an assault, sexual or otherwise.
Isn't that what the trial is supposed to find out? I don't know a lot about the UK justice system, but I imagine they wouldn't issue a warrant without something to bring to the trial.
I just seems too convenient that he would be accused of rape now.
If there was no misconduct, then we will find out, and the charges will be dropped.