News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silicon Valley Is Not a Fad by acheron on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @09:27AM (#19787677)
No. Nobody ever does that.

We count centuries that way, because we say "1st century", "20th century", "21st century". (That is, "20th century AD".) Ordinal numbers, based on the year 1 AD.

Nobody says "178th decade", or "213th decade". Decades are cardinal numbers. Nobody starts "the decade" in the 1 year.

Re:Silicon Valley Is Not a Fad by falsedan on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @12:02PM (#19789128)
> Nobody start "the decade" in the 1 year.

wow rude, I do. I think the 60s started 1961-01-01 and understand that people usually mean "the years that give a quotient of 196 when divided by 10".

I understand that we use ordinals to refer to centuries, also I understand how that's unrelated to which specific years are in a decade/century/millennium

fun fact the Australian constitution came into force on the 1st of January, 1901, aligning with the starting boundary of the 20th century.

Re:Silicon Valley Is Not a Fad by cylinder on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @04:29PM (#19791609)
So if someone mentioned something nice happening in 1960 you'd say "yeah the Fifties were great!" ?
Re:Silicon Valley Is Not a Fad by falsedan on Tuesday April 30, 2019 @07:20PM (#19792996)
wow rude again, that's not 'assuming the best intent of the commentator' and is against this site's code of conduct

> [I] understand that people usually mean "the years that give a quotient of 196 when divided by 10".

since I'm not a pedantic sicko that gets off on telling people they're wrong and lording my hugely advanced intellect over them, I use human words for genuine natural interactions.