News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Good Developers Are Promoted into Unhappiness (2007) by mlthoughts2018 on Sunday April 28, 2019 @10:06AM (#19771198)
Most of the companies I’ve worked for have utterly no possible capacity for formally managing special projects. It will either be an argument over what business goals the project must serve, whose autonomy gets to drive the project, politics about who gets to work on what.

The only successful special projects I’ve ever seen are ones that are off the books initially, possibly even pissing off product managers or others because engineers essentially have to flippantly disregard the official prioritization of tasks according to non-engineers and just override it with what the engineer can easily see is actually more important from a genuine business/product perspective but can’t waste the time trying to jump through the hoops of political jockeying disingenuously asserted to be sincere evidence gathering to satisfy all the other competing interests and credit grabs.

Re:Why Good Developers Are Promoted into Unhappiness (2007) by sk5t on Sunday April 28, 2019 @01:29PM (#19772375)
I've done special projects at a large, somewhat stodgy company, and the general pattern was that you had about nine months to do good work, just engineering and business folks together, after which point the "project management office" would get their hooks into it, and any further scheduled meetings would be prevented from achieving anything productive in deference to the new project manager's interest in gantt charts.
Re:Why Good Developers Are Promoted into Unhappiness (2007) by maxxxxx on Sunday April 28, 2019 @05:25PM (#19773794)
Special projects also often get handed to a consulting company and not to in-house staff