Almost everything in the list is pure emotional not logical. This could have been summed up by saying science doesn’t explain illogical things like subjective points of view on morals, art, how to use knowledge. The God one is interesting because it’s not emotional. Either God exist or doesn’t. However, I think we just don’t have sufficient knowledge, technology, and sources right know to prove it one way or the other, but if we don’t blow ourselves up...

God doesn't need to exist to give essence to existence. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonexistent-objects/

Umm, I never said anything close to resembling that idea.

You said "Either God exist or doesn’t." This isn't necessarily true.

True, and it is true.