News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla is giving up on their IRC server by the8472 on Saturday April 27, 2019 @02:49PM (#19767006)
The issue is that zapzupnz deletions to propagate. This can only be ensured in locked-down systems.

There's a difference between offering corrections and retractions that others may or may not accept and actually enforcing deletions. This is both socially and information-theoretically true.

Re:Mozilla is giving up on their IRC server by zapzupnz on Saturday April 27, 2019 @04:56PM (#19767577)
All I said is that the deletions should be propagated. The presentation of this can only be ensured in locked-down systems, but the actual propagation is simple enough. Just as the server can send all users within a channel "so-and-so said this message", it can say "so-and-so deleted this message" — it can be left up to the client whether to actually remove it or perhaps just hide it, ready to be shown again with a click.

Obviously on Discord, one is tied to the official client's behaviour since the ToS discourages third party clients. However, for Slack, Mattermost, Matrix etc. clients, the possibilities widen up.

Re:Mozilla is giving up on their IRC server by the8472 on Sunday April 28, 2019 @09:28AM (#19771049)
Ah, I read "deletion" as the actual effect, not the request for the action to be performed.