News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by modriano on Saturday April 27, 2019 @01:32PM (#19766609)
How do you define "bullshit major"?
Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by m0zg on Saturday April 27, 2019 @01:42PM (#19766676)
A major which the labor market doesn't need in the quantities that are being churned out by colleges, such as the classic "would you like fries with that" English major.

It's not "bullshit" if you're independently wealthy and can pay to "study" for "fun", or as a second major to something that's in demand. But for everybody else I'd consider more in-demand professions, even though they're usually much harder.

For an example, take a gander at this list: https://www.washington.edu/students/gencat/degree_programsTO.... All the bullshit majors are very easily identifiable. Most, but not all of them have "studies" in their name.

Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by 13415 on Saturday April 27, 2019 @02:03PM (#19766785)
That doesn't make the degrees bullshit, though, it merely means that studying the respective field is less likely to be very economically rewarding. You need to make a difference between practical life advice and evaluations of areas and disciplines, or otherwise you'd also have to say that Vincent van Gogh and H.P. Lovecraft were total losers. They weren't. Wittgenstein gave away most of his inherited wealth when he was a young man. That doesn't make him an idiot either.

That being said, there are some crappy degrees out there. Some disciplines are mostly just watered down philosophy and I'd go for philosophy instead anytime.

Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by m0zg on Saturday April 27, 2019 @02:18PM (#19766867)

  >> it merely means that 
  >> studying the respective field is less likely 
  >> to be very economically rewarding
Um, no, I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one. Paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in borrowed money for something which doesn't provide any ROI is IMO bullshit, particularly so if you can't discharge the debt under bankruptcy.

Your examples are bad too, because back in the day all those painters, writers, etc, were either independently wealthy already, or did other jobs before they became famous. H.P. Lovecraft, for instance, worked as a traveling salesman. Van Gogh both comes from a wealthy family _and_ had a job at an art dealer. And there are very few of such people anyway, it's not a viable route for most people, it's more like a lottery.

Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by SantalBlush on Saturday April 27, 2019 @04:06PM (#19767349)
Again, this doesn't mean that the degree is bullshit; it means the degree is grossly overpriced. In reality, almost all degrees are overpriced right now.
Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by NotSammyHagar on Saturday April 27, 2019 @01:48PM (#19766708)
You can go even farther, if less than 50% of the people studying it work in that field, maybe less than 20% work there? And their expected wages can't pay for the cost of the college education in 20 years, then it's very questionable to study in that field. Unless you are rich already.
Re:I'm a Data Scientist and It's Not My Passion by modriano on Sunday April 28, 2019 @01:28PM (#19772369)
>You can go even farther, if less than 50% of the people studying it work in that field, maybe less than 20% work there?

By that metric, one of my undergrad majors (physics) is a bullshit major as very few of us went into that field. But it prepared us very well for many other fields, so I'd say that metric is not meaningful.