Re:Saudi Arabia beheads man for sending messages about prote...
by astrodust on Friday April 26, 2019 @07:03PM
(#19762521)
You say there's no real ties, then you go on to describe several real ties.
Re:Saudi Arabia beheads man for sending messages about prote...
by devoply on Friday April 26, 2019 @07:11PM
(#19762569)
I would not consider converging economic interests ties. As those can change at any moment. I guess the whole war racketeering thing is the same thing, you destroy a country to rebuild it. If they are already doing that, letting you build it then what's the point of destroying it.
Re:Saudi Arabia beheads man for sending messages about prote...
by chillacy on Friday April 26, 2019 @08:22PM
(#19762909)
I had assumed that in geopolitics the order goes:
1. Security interests
2. Economic interests
3. Shared values
Re:Saudi Arabia beheads man for sending messages about prote...
by hedora on Friday April 26, 2019 @09:26PM
(#19763157)
You forgot:
0. Personal gain
(At least until they start enforcing anti-bribery laws against the first family.)
Re:Saudi Arabia beheads man for sending messages about prote...
by gremlinsinc on Friday April 26, 2019 @11:51PM
(#19763663)
When did we start zero-indexing numbered lists?
Like for instance from Wikipedia:
> In the backlash against Saudi Arabia and Wahhabism (after 9/11), the Saudi government was portrayed in the media, Senate hearings, and elsewhere as
> a sort of oily heart of darkness, the wellspring of a bleak, hostile value system that is the very antithesis of our own. America's seventy-year alliance with the kingdom has been reappraised as a ghastly mistake, a selling of the soul, a gas-addicted alliance with death.[60]
> There was even a proposal at the Defense Policy Board, (an arm of Department of Defense) to consider `taking Saudi out of Arabia` by forcibly seizing control of the oil fields, giving the Hijaz back to the Hashemites, and delegating control of Medina and Mecca to a multinational committee of moderate, non-Wahhabi Muslims.