News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twittering About Architecture by gruseom on Thursday May 22, 2008 @04:37PM (#197538)
The post says little that's specific. What it does say - our problem is different, it's hard, we're making progress - might all be true, but these are also the kinds of things people say when a software project is in trouble. It's hard to tell anything at all from reading the post.
Re:Twittering About Architecture by icey on Thursday May 22, 2008 @05:13PM (#197562)
Well, what it lacks in specificity it makes up for by way of the lack of finger-pointing that we'd seen in the past from the Twitter team.
Re:Twittering About Architecture by joshwa on Thursday May 22, 2008 @09:14PM (#197707)
They did call out one of the many "why is it so hard to scale twitter" posts as being "one of their favorites":

http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/03/on-scaling-a-mi...

Re:Twittering About Architecture by nirmal on Friday May 23, 2008 @12:42AM (#197779)
Everyone should read this blog post and the 2 followups. It brings a lot of insight into the parts of Twitter that bring it down and it has nothing to do with the message pushing part of Twitter.

I have a Jabber bot running that is hooked into the entire public timeline and it continues to run even when the main website has gone down. I don't think you can directly compare Twitter's issues with issues of Meebo, AIM, GTalk, etc.