Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by miskin on Thursday April 25, 2019 @02:30PM
(#19751133)
What if bees transfer these genes to your field next to customer that bought those special seeds? Should you worry about using seeds from your field due to possible legal issues?
Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by rad_gruchalski on Thursday April 25, 2019 @03:16PM
(#19751537)
Even better - what if you actually do not want these modified crops. Who do you sue?
Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by NeuNeurosis on Thursday April 25, 2019 @04:25PM
(#19752175)
This has already happened.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-monsanto-lawsuit/kans...
Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by AlexandrB on Thursday April 25, 2019 @02:33PM
(#19751156)
> Should that result be protectable?
No, because living organisms should not be patentable/protectable.
Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by thereisnospork on Thursday April 25, 2019 @04:15PM
(#19752099)
Please explain why you feel that should be the case; a statement is not an argument.
Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by silversconfused on Thursday April 25, 2019 @07:46PM
(#19753610)
This doesn't require an argument. It requires common sense.
Re:Potato farmers cry foul as PepsiCo sues them
by thereisnospork on Saturday April 27, 2019 @02:42AM
(#19764183)
Yes it does; reasonable people are disagreeing.
OK. What if the researcher instead engages in genetic engineering and produces an onion that is gene-for-gene identitcal and indeed exhibits the behavior? Should that result be protectable?