News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf] by Nursie on Thursday April 25, 2019 @09:22AM (#19747767)
If you want to avoid development overhead, absolutely, C is a terrible language to pick.

I'm not sure what you mean by compatibility issues in this context?

Re:Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf] by solarkraft on Friday April 26, 2019 @11:08AM (#19758284)
I'm thinking about differen string representations used by different libraries. Is this not true?
Re:Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf] by Nursie on Friday April 26, 2019 @12:29PM (#19759234)
Honestly all I've encountered default strings (and people shy away from those now) and LibICU stuff. I think ICU has become a defacto standard but I have been out of C for a few years.

This tends to be important for strings you're going to show to the user (or input you gather from them), maybe most of the C in the world isn't aimed at interfaces like that...