News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:They think they are above the law: the firms who own Amer... by forgotmypw3 on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @11:42AM (#19729686)
I don't think blockchain necessarily means anyone being able to make blocks.
Re:They think they are above the law: the firms who own Amer... by joshfraser on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @11:52AM (#19729785)
Distributed control is still useful. It makes it incredibly expensive to try and tamper with the results.
Re:They think they are above the law: the firms who own Amer... by jammygit on Tuesday April 23, 2019 @11:46AM (#19729723)
So the important part is the visibility of the blockchain, not the distributed control? One could still verify whether tampering had occurred?
Re:They think they are above the law: the firms who own Amer... by forgotmypw3 on Wednesday April 24, 2019 @11:17PM (#19744679)
In my forum project, I use blockchain-like elements in the sense that when one replies to an existing comment, they include its hash in the reply text, which is then PGP-signed.

It is not a chain, however, more like a tree/web. And anyone can inspect the tree and re-verify its validity.

What is on the tree, however, is decided by me, the webmaster-operator. If there are troll comments that I want removed, they're gone. But I cannot forge something by another user, because I do not have their private key.

And anyone else can fork the forum and append to the tree in their own way, and I cannot stop them.