News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Whanganui River in New Zealand is a legal person by brlewis on Monday April 22, 2019 @06:00PM (#19723441)
Whose law? In the U.S. there's a term called "party" for whoever's suing or being sued. It can be a person or a combination of parties. Three people can be sued without collectively being a human being.

Also in the U.S., the controversy about corporations being persons has to do with selectively granting them constitutional rights, not about their identity as human beings.

Re:The Whanganui River in New Zealand is a legal person by dragonwriter on Monday April 22, 2019 @07:07PM (#19723969)
> In the U.S. there's a term called "party" for whoever's suing or being sued. It can be a person or a combination of parties.

A party is a person who is a litigant in a lawsuit, to be a party, one must first be a legal person.

> Also in the U.S., the controversy about corporations being persons has to do with selectively granting them constitutional rights,

That's actually a controversy about a different kind of personhood than is being discussed (that is whether they are within the scope of “person” in the sense used in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, which has been addressed not in terms of juridical personhood but in terms of the necessity of such to give effect to rights of natural persons acting through the corporation.)

Re:The Whanganui River in New Zealand is a legal person by zapzupnz on Monday April 22, 2019 @06:54PM (#19723868)
> Three people can be sued without collectively being a human being

Wouldn't that simply be three persons?