Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by turc1656 on Monday April 22, 2019 @04:23PM
(#19722569)
You are correct. I was wrong. I found an explanation of it but can no longer edit my original comment.
https://www.law.com/corpcounsel/2018/11/01/when-a-walkout-hi...
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by dekhn on Monday April 22, 2019 @02:21PM
(#19721306)
Which is why any actions Google would take against the organizers would be especially carefully scrutinized. That's why I'm surprised- to take this action, Google HR would have to know they would be watched closely and likely end up with a court case (a skeptic might surmise that the protestors were hoping such a case would occur).
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by idlewords on Monday April 22, 2019 @02:24PM
(#19721355)
Effective retaliation turns a difficult HR and employee morale problem into a minor legal problem. A court case is a bad outcome for labor organizers—they can never hope to match the resources their employer can bring to bear, and the proceedings can last for years. For that reason, it's a good outcome for the employer, and why you see large companies using the tactic at the first sign of labor unrest.
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by Jasper_ on Monday April 22, 2019 @02:55PM
(#19721708)
White collar crime (like retaliation, or wage theft) is rarely tried or prosecuted for.
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by tptacek on Friday April 26, 2019 @09:41AM
(#19757336)
Violations of the NLRA are rarely criminal.
Google is not allowed to retaliate, either by punishing them, or by offering positive incentives to others to not participate in the conduct.