News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neuroscientist Larry Cahill on the ‘neurosexism’ debate by everdrive on Monday April 22, 2019 @01:57PM (#19721065)
> I want to agree with that statement. But, there's a problem: how can we come up with a method of judging worth that doesn't rely on some sort of "over-human validator" (e.g. God)?

Our brains are pretty well built for this. Are you sure that requiring human-type validation is even avoidable at all?

There are no comments on this comment yet.