Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by compiler-guy on Monday April 22, 2019 @01:47PM
(#19720963)
Protected activities are protected. You'll notice from the text of that article that some of the retaliation stopped once a lawyer got involved.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by hnal943 on Monday April 22, 2019 @02:07PM
(#19721150)
There are lots of reasons the involvement of lawyers could slow things down. That doesn't mean that Google was behaving illegally.
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by java-man on Monday April 22, 2019 @01:48PM
(#19720980)
I am sure they'll be moved to a different project and then subsequently fired for "performance reasons".
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by Jasper_ on Monday April 22, 2019 @01:51PM
(#19721013)
That is also against the law. From https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/retaliation.cfm
> For example, depending on the facts, it could be retaliation if an employer acts because of the employee's EEO activity to:
> * transfer the employee to a less desirable position;
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by malcolmgreaves on Monday April 22, 2019 @01:54PM
(#19721038)
Thank goodness for the labor movement.
Re:Google Walkout Organizers Say They're Facing Retaliation
by kolbe on Monday April 22, 2019 @02:03PM
(#19721114)
The problem with that, like so many laws, is that you have to prove motive for the law to work. I'm sure the previous commenter is not so naive as to think companies give a formal, written demotion stating that their EEO activity was the reason.