Re:Planting 1.2T Trees Could Cancel Out a Decade of CO2 Emis...
by village-idiot on Sunday April 21, 2019 @02:49PM
(#19713783)
It’s cheap to plant baby trees, and baby trees are the ones that are about to go through their main carbon absorption cycle anyways.
Re:Planting 1.2T Trees Could Cancel Out a Decade of CO2 Emis...
by bjourne on Sunday April 21, 2019 @03:50PM
(#19714153)
It is not difficult but doing it without the right machinery requires back-breaking labor. It looks like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUzeruQT8xE I did it one full weekend and I was totally exhausted. Of course, there exists machines to do that, but then you can't have every person in the world chipping in.
But planting is just the first step. If you own a growing forest it needs to be culled periodically, meaning that you cut down the worst performing 10-20% of all trees.
Re:Planting 1.2T Trees Could Cancel Out a Decade of CO2 Emis...
by ip26 on Sunday April 21, 2019 @10:53PM
(#19716056)
That video is what you consider back-breaking? I planted ten trees on my property with a mattock & shovel over the course of two weeks, removing maybe fifty gallons of clay for each hole, and while it was hard I wouldn't describe it as back-breaking. You'd also adapt to it as you got stronger...
If over one year everyone planted 3 trees per week, and we employed a work force of people to cultivate them further, we would make a huge dent in our catastrophic risk exposure? Sure, it's seemingly impractical alongside the status quo of land distribution and use ( $$$ into develop all the land and farm humans for rent!!), but... more green will be good for the health of nearly all the living things on Earth, and at the very least give us more time to find even better solutions.