Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr...
by zbraniecki on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:10PM
(#19686055)
I don't know if there's any public statement about this. I base my position on experience at Unicode Conference and work on CLDR and ICU. I understand that it diminishes the value of my claim.
I can also point out to ICU MessageFormat - which has been designed much after Gettext and, I'd dare to say on purpose, bares no resemblance to it.
Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr...
by ngrilly on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:16PM
(#19686099)
I agree that CLDR plural forms and ICU MessageFormat are somehow an implicit critic of gettext design :-)
Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr...
by zbraniecki on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:22PM
(#19686169)
Hahaha, thank you! I still feel ashamed of making a strong claim based on informal conversations, but I feel a bit vindicated by your agreement! :)
Did the Unicode consortium express critics about gettext? Could you provide some reference about this?