News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr... by ngrilly on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:08PM (#19686027)
> Our opinion is similar to Unicode's - Gettext is fundamentally flawed design for internationalization purposes.

Did the Unicode consortium express critics about gettext? Could you provide some reference about this?

Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr... by zbraniecki on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:10PM (#19686055)
I don't know if there's any public statement about this. I base my position on experience at Unicode Conference and work on CLDR and ICU. I understand that it diminishes the value of my claim.

I can also point out to ICU MessageFormat - which has been designed much after Gettext and, I'd dare to say on purpose, bares no resemblance to it.

Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr... by ngrilly on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:16PM (#19686099)
I agree that CLDR plural forms and ICU MessageFormat are somehow an implicit critic of gettext design :-)
Re:Fluent 1.0: a localization system for natural-sounding tr... by zbraniecki on Wednesday April 17, 2019 @04:22PM (#19686169)
Hahaha, thank you! I still feel ashamed of making a strong claim based on informal conversations, but I feel a bit vindicated by your agreement! :)