Re:Ask HN: What is the Holy Grail for Software Engineering?
by evanrmurphy on Friday December 03, 2010 @09:15PM
(#1968221)
Vinge's "superhuman intelligence" rhetoric bothers me because it suggests that intelligence is a one-dimensional quantity. I don't think this makes sense except in the context of specific domains. For example, a basic calculator has superhuman intelligence when it comes to arithmetic, because it can evaluate arbitrary expressions much faster than a human can and doesn't make mistakes. But it's dumb about everything else.
Update: The child comment by binaryfinery points to where Vinge addresses this. Sorry, I failed to add the disclaimer that I only skimmed the article.
Re:Ask HN: What is the Holy Grail for Software Engineering?
by binaryfinery on Friday December 03, 2010 @09:40PM
(#1968274)
FTFA: "Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any any man however clever"
http://mindstalk.net/vinge/vinge-sing.html
I think Vinge explains it better than Kurzweil.