News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Medical researcher discovers integration, gets 75 citations by hugh3 on Friday December 03, 2010 @05:39PM (#1967721)
To be fair, James D. Watson is a bit of a jerk who delights in calling other people stupid. Usually winning a Nobel Prize tends to make people more charitable, since they no longer need to prove themselves to anybody... apparently it didn't work for Watson.

I wouldn't recommend following Watson's advice on the correct attitude to your fellow man.

For further information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_D._Watson and scroll down to "Controversies".

Re:Medical researcher discovers integration, gets 75 citations by btilly on Friday December 03, 2010 @09:04PM (#1968189)
I would speculate that the reason it didn't work for Watson is the unacknowledged use of Rosalind Franklin's data, with the resulting belief by many that Watson couldn't have done it on his own. The fact that Rosalind died in part due to radiation absorbed during collecting that data adds to the controversy.

Here is a piece of interesting trivia about that. Rosalind Franklin was a true expert on x-ray diffraction. However there are 230 possible space groups. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_group for more on that.) The x-ray diffraction pattern you see depends on the space group, and so one of the first step is to go through all of the possibilities and identify which one you have, and only then can you really start figuring out what you have. Rosalind Franklin knew about all of them. But by luck Watson's PhD thesis had been on a protein with the exact same set of symmetries that DNA has. As a result he was in a much better position than she to interpret her data.

Re:Medical researcher discovers integration, gets 75 citations by crocowhile on Saturday December 04, 2010 @12:46AM (#1968633)
Yes, Watson is a known jerk who got hit badly by age. That doesn't mean he's wrong when he claims most scientists are stupid. They are.