News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history by WalterBright on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @04:35PM (#19677065)
Reminds me of an article I read about attempts to restore a Ferrari that had crashed and burned. It had been totally destroyed, the only thing salvageable was the serial number plate.

The debate was, of course, whether this project was a restoration or a replication. I don't think there's a difference.

A few years ago I visited a hangar in Everett where some enthusiasts had borrowed an Me262 from a museum in order to take it apart and produce mechanical drawings of everything. Then they built flying replicas from the ground up and sold them. Some changes were made for safety and practicality reasons.

So were they real Me262s or not? I'd say they were real. I wished I could have bought one.

Re:The Notre Dame fire and the future of history by int_19h on Tuesday April 16, 2019 @07:18PM (#19678176)
Well, it depends on your definition of "real"...

The market certainly distinguishes replicas from originals, even in situations such as you describe. For example, modern replicas of 19th century firearms can be 10x cheaper than the originals, even if they are perfect reproductions down to materials used. So, whatever the reason, people do care on average.