Re:Icons: Avoid temptation and start with user needs
by epistasis on Sunday April 14, 2019 @08:43PM
(#19662542)
Agreed 100%. For companies that appear to usually be data driven, the fetish for minimalism and removal of basic UI affordances in the pursuit of style has been a bit shocking.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Icons: Avoid temptation and start with user needs
by mgkimsal on Sunday April 14, 2019 @10:24PM
(#19662835)
the data points to other companies/products/projects doing it, and they seem to have customers, get funding, and still be in business. I don't even need to invoke the cynicism of "resume-driven-development" to get to that point, and I think that's probably as deep as some people go when justifying their design direction.
Re:Icons: Avoid temptation and start with user needs
by jrochkind1 on Monday April 15, 2019 @09:12AM
(#19665017)
Well, NHS seems to have found that a text link (with an icon) is better than a button.
> We also found arrow icons highlight ‘action’ links for users wanting to find help. They're noticeable but, unlike buttons, users actually read the link.
I think it just depends, some things we think are UI affordances aren't, I'm not sure it's just minimalism vs not. Just that you gotta test.