Why isn't there a social network only for video?

Posted by alexanderklein on Sunday April 14, 2019 @05:01PM
from the self-post dept.

( 9 comments | 2 points | on HN )

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by kayamon on Sunday April 14, 2019 @05:50PM (#19661920)

There are many.

Tiktok. YouTube. Take your pick.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by adamnemecek on Sunday April 14, 2019 @07:47PM (#19662366)

Social on youtube is cancer. Tiktok is cancer entirely.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by freedman1611 on Sunday April 14, 2019 @10:13PM (#19662808)

There are good groups on Youtube and bad ones just like any social platform. Humans can be cancer is the right observation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by adamnemecek on Monday April 15, 2019 @08:00PM (#19669937)

What is groups? You mean channels?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by el_dev_hell on Sunday April 14, 2019 @08:37PM (#19662524)

The question has nothing to do with quality.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by happppy on Monday April 15, 2019 @07:47AM (#19664630)

tiktok is literally shit yet addictive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by dontbenebby on Monday April 15, 2019 @01:03PM (#19666845)

Because Twitter killed it

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by LarryMade2 on Sunday April 14, 2019 @08:06PM (#19662427)

Isn't that Instagram?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why isn't there a social network only for video? by quickthrower2 on Sunday April 14, 2019 @11:28PM (#19662975)

Snapchat?

[ Parent | on HN ]