News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times sells premium ads based on how an arti... by coldtea on Sunday April 14, 2019 @02:38PM (#19660909)
>* On its face, this is shocking to me. I would have never, ever expected positive content to be more profitable than negative content! In hindsight, however, after thinking about it a bit, it kind of makes sense. I'm now wondering, could advertising perhaps become (gasp) a force for good, at least in certain settings?*

News are good when they are neither positive nor negative by design.

They are good when they are relevant, useful, and informative (including them not being cherry-picked examples of stories with no impact to their readership, e.g. about some sensational murder case 10.000 miles away, and so on).

Re:The New York Times sells premium ads based on how an arti... by zepearl on Sunday April 14, 2019 @07:29PM (#19662307)
You're theoretical, respectively not related to the statement posted as it's subjective.