Re:JSON as configuration files: please don’t (2016)
by iampims on Saturday April 13, 2019 @12:37PM
(#19654032)
YAML is whitespace sensitive, that alone is a nightmare.
Re:JSON as configuration files: please don’t (2016)
by nixpulvis on Saturday April 13, 2019 @12:46PM
(#19654099)
Yes, as someone who helps with some software with a YAML config, the whitespace issue has caused much time in IRC spent trading pastebins fixing these.
I agree overall YAML looks pretty nice, and consistent whitespace is a strong preference (I have pre-commit hooks), breaking user (if you have them) config if they don't know about this is an issue tho.
Re:JSON as configuration files: please don’t (2016)
by the_imp on Saturday April 13, 2019 @02:27PM
(#19654795)
Do note that in addition to block collections, YAML also supports the flow collections of JSON, which are not whitespace sensitive. In fact, YAML 1.2 is a superset of JSON, and you can parse JSON with # comments as entirely valid YAML.
Re:JSON as configuration files: please don’t (2016)
by ohaideredevs on Saturday April 13, 2019 @12:37PM
(#19654033)
As someone who uses YAML and doesn't know it well (Thanks for nothing Docker & K8s) - I see absolutely zero difference between the two as far as one being better than the other goes, except the whitespace sensitivity which the other user mentioned, which really is a pain.
All the benefits of JSON with none of the negatives.