Re:Great developers are raised, not hired
by waiseristy on Friday April 12, 2019 @03:12PM
(#19648059)
I don't see why this rules out giving A.) developers who have now become B.) developers a raise to match their increased value
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Because it is still more expensive than just hiring b).
If you decreased a) wages during their initial training to cover the costs and be able to break even with b)-like wages at the end of the training, you wouldn't be able to hire anyone as a) at all.