Re:Spotify Saved the Music Industry (But Not Necessarily Mus...
by pertsix on Friday April 12, 2019 @02:30PM
(#19647670)
This is not true/unfair interpretation.
An artist does not get paid after the first payment from the label from the sale of a CD. If you play the CD on repeat, the artist does not benefit, nor does the label.
/Labels/ get paid for every single listen on Spotify.
There is also Spotify Direct, too, and the artist can directly benefit more than if they went with a label.
Re:Spotify Saved the Music Industry (But Not Necessarily Mus...
by geden on Sunday April 14, 2019 @04:29PM
(#19661515)
You appear to have missed the point. I'm singling out a genre of music where you might only listen to an album a few times. So repeat plays are irrelevant.
Re:Spotify Saved the Music Industry (But Not Necessarily Mus...
by kzrdude on Friday April 12, 2019 @03:24PM
(#19648161)
Maybe pay per play is not fair, payout shouldn't be linearly proportional to number of plays!
Re:Spotify Saved the Music Industry (But Not Necessarily Mus...
by syrrim on Friday April 12, 2019 @08:52PM
(#19650349)
huh? is label revenue unrelated to artist revenue?
Re:Spotify Saved the Music Industry (But Not Necessarily Mus...
by GuiA on Friday April 12, 2019 @02:10PM
(#19647445)
If you care about an artist, buy things from them. Records, tee shirts, posters, concert tickets, etc. Streaming revenue is essentially a rounding error.
Before: 2 listens = dealer price of a CD in UK = about £7.5 (on a good UK indie that's split 50/50 with the artist).
Now: 2 listens = income from 2 streams on Spotify = about £0.0006
I'm thinking of artists like Autechre.
Spotify is starting the shape the sort of music that artists can be successful with, in a bad way.