News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boeing 737 Max Crashes: Sensors Vulnerable to Failure by lutorm on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:17PM (#19638166)
Are you a pilot? This is the basic way that a pilot can know whether he's close to stall without anything more than an airspeed indicator.

It's basic flight physics. The lift developed by the wing is equal to CL.q.A. A is the wing area, the dynamic pressure q is basically indicated by the airspeed indicator, and CL is a known function of AoA. Lift is by definition equal to the load factor * mass.

For a good, in-depth explanation, see http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/aoa.html#sec-ias-aoa

Re:Boeing 737 Max Crashes: Sensors Vulnerable to Failure by bbojan on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:57PM (#19639681)
The pilot can "know whether he's close to stall without anything more than an airspeed indicator" only if he's not in a turn (see accelerated stall).

While you are right in theory - if you knew the load factor and indicated airspeed (IAS) you could determine AoA - how would you measure IAS in practice? Normally a pitot tube would give you incorrect readings at non-zero angles of attack, and that's why airplanes use an input from an AoA sensor for correction. Which brings you back to where you started - an AoA sensor.

You are second-guessing tens (hundreds?) of thousands of engineers who thought about these problems for more than a hundred years.

Re:Boeing 737 Max Crashes: Sensors Vulnerable to Failure by peteradio on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:27PM (#19638243)
I have my PhD in physics. And CL is determined how?
Re:Boeing 737 Max Crashes: Sensors Vulnerable to Failure by lutorm on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:45PM (#19638412)
Rearrange and get:

CL(AoA) = Az.m/(q.A)

(Az = vertical acceleration.) The relationship between coefficient of lift and AoA is a known function that depends on the airfoil. As long as you're below the critical angle of attack, it's an invertible function. (If you're not below the critical AoA, you've already departed controlled flight so it's too late for MCAS.)

Re:Boeing 737 Max Crashes: Sensors Vulnerable to Failure by peteradio on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:52PM (#19638468)
> In flight, the lift is nearly always equal to the weightlab times load factor. (From your link)

This is not true at or near stall conditions.

Re:Boeing 737 Max Crashes: Sensors Vulnerable to Failure by lutorm on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:18PM (#19639324)
How so? As far as I understand, it will hold to a very high degree as long as the flight conditions are stable over the time scale needed to establish the airflow pattern over the wing, which is very short.

(If the flight conditions are that unstable, a mechanical AoA vane will struggle too, since it has mechanical inertia.)