Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by luckylion on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:05PM
(#19637409)
Wow, 10,000 per km² sounds crazy ambitious. By those standards, Germany is a ghost land, cities here barely reach those numbers in the densely populated parts, certainly not on average.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by seanmcdirmid on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:15PM
(#19637491)
Keep in mind they are built out for that density, having comparably much less density (much closer to a German small town) before development.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by ASalazarMX on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:30PM
(#19637663)
Berlin has 3,944 inhabitants per km2. If not even that city reaches the standard, I think the criteria must be flawed. My city is the third largest in Mexico and it has less than 3500/km2.
Or maybe we need an article about ghost countries.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by HuangYuSan on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:01PM
(#19638024)
I guess the standards necessarily are different for a city of skyscrapers
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by seanmcdirmid on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:01PM
(#19639169)
Pudong was definitely in that range before it was developed. Chinese densities are completely different from the rest of the word. No one calls a 3500/km2 area a ghost city of it is built for 3500/km2, but if it’s built for 10k/km2 with lots of 30 story apartment blocks, there are a lot of empty units and you can play football in the overbuilt 8 lane streets.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by Mirioron on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:57PM
(#19637979)
Berlin has forests within its borders.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by s_trumpet on Friday April 12, 2019 @03:39AM
(#19642830)
So does Mumbai (the Sanjay Gandhi National Park) and it still supports a density of 73,000 people/sq km.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by seanmcdirmid on Friday April 12, 2019 @05:45PM
(#19649315)
What? Wikipedia has Mumbai at just 21k/sqkm, and even that seems to be megacity (urban) density, not its metro density, which is only 4,700/sqkm. I assume the national park is in the latter and not the former.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by CharlesColeman on Thursday April 11, 2019 @04:35PM
(#19638895)
> Wow, 10,000 per km² sounds crazy ambitious. By those standards, Germany is a ghost land, cities here barely reach those numbers in the densely populated parts, certainly not on average.
Yeah, but to get those levels, they fill blocks with dozens of identical 25 story apartment buildings. E.g.: https://pulitzercenter.org/sites/default/files/styles/node_i...
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by seanmcdirmid on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:19PM
(#19639335)
They are usually 32 stories high since that is how far they can go with concrete.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by benj111 on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:08PM
(#19639220)
That isn't inherent to getting the density though. You could design them all differently if you wanted.
You could find an example of a row of identical buildings in any country, it doesn't prove anything.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by CharlesColeman on Thursday April 11, 2019 @05:25PM
(#19639395)
It isn't inherent, but it sure is attention grabbing. In my experience, cookie-cutter construction is far more common, at a far larger scale, and far more obvious in China than in any other country I've visited.
Re:‘China’s Manhattan’ Borrowed Heavily, but the People Have...
by thaumasiotes on Thursday April 11, 2019 @04:51PM
(#19639071)
By Chinese standards, most places are barely populated. They are a fifth of the world.