News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cambridge's Ambitious Protected Bike Lane Law by fukbezos on Thursday April 11, 2019 @12:18PM (#19636173)
The simple answer is bikes and cars should never share the same infrastructure. They'll never get along with each other and the bike loses every time. It also doesn't help that bikers don't follow the laws properly. Bikers have to pay attention more than drivers, they should act like it
Re:Cambridge's Ambitious Protected Bike Lane Law by adrianN on Thursday April 11, 2019 @01:34PM (#19637051)
I don't know the statistics for the US, but here in Germany 75% of the accidents between cyclists are cars are caused by the car.
Re:Cambridge's Ambitious Protected Bike Lane Law by eots on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:05PM (#19637404)
I drive a car now and then in Cambridge and Boston, and I have to be constantly on a lookout for misbehaving cyclists. It's like most of cyclists are not even familiar with basic traffic regulations. If I was not paying extra attention, and was simply following traffic regulations on my end, I would be involved in more that a few car/bicycle accident.
Re:Cambridge's Ambitious Protected Bike Lane Law by adrianN on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:28PM (#19637646)
I'm sure you'd say the same about cars if you were a cyclist. Both bicycles and cars are driven by humans and they generally don't give a damn about the rules unless they benefit personally. The difference is that cyclists usually endanger themselves, while motorists endanger others.
Re:Cambridge's Ambitious Protected Bike Lane Law by JohnFen on Friday April 12, 2019 @01:18PM (#19646886)
I know that an anecdote is not data, but the only time I've been in an accident with a car, it was because the car ran a stop sign, causing me to slam into the side of it.

And yes, I was seriously hurt.