News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ice cold archive storage by mmahemoff on Thursday April 11, 2019 @10:02AM (#19634612)
AWS's new Glacier Deep is actually cheaper than Google's Ice Cold, $1/TB/month.

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/03/S3-glacie...

Re:Ice cold archive storage by jhack on Thursday April 11, 2019 @10:28AM (#19634853)
Those retrieval costs, though...
Re:Ice cold archive storage by tedmiston on Thursday April 11, 2019 @10:36AM (#19634927)
Anyone know the retrieval cost for Ice Cold? I don't see it mentioned in the post.
Re:Ice cold archive storage by pnutjam on Thursday April 11, 2019 @10:51AM (#19635048)
If it's the same as their other storage, which isn't really clear... About $50 /TB
Re:Ice cold archive storage by shittyadmin on Thursday April 11, 2019 @02:13PM (#19637482)
On B2 that's $10... yeah, might be reconsidering this...
Re:Ice cold archive storage by m3nu on Thursday April 11, 2019 @11:43AM (#19635754)
I expect that Google will also charge for retrieval. Their egress is really really expensive.

There may also be a minimum storage period, like Amazon has.

Let's wait and see.

Re:Ice cold archive storage by puzzle on Thursday April 11, 2019 @12:44PM (#19636469)
It looks like a lower tier than the existing Coldline and Nearline (7x cheaper for storage than the former). Both have a minimum period, so this one is likely to have one as well. Coldline and Nearline are more expensive than regular storage when fetching objects, which means ice cold storage is probably even more expensive when you restore (is it going to be 7x, too, keeping symmetry?).
Re:Ice cold archive storage by Hamuko on Thursday April 11, 2019 @01:50PM (#19637237)
Is their egress more expensive than Amazon's? Because when I had a look at that, it sure wasn't cheap either.