Re:Measuring the overhead of WebAssembly using libsodium
by muxator on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @05:42PM
(#19629089)
Did you had a look at Qt? It can do best of both worlds
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Measuring the overhead of WebAssembly using libsodium
by ScottFree on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @09:33PM
(#19630366)
I'm having a hard time finding a good, comprehensive comparison between Qt and Electron. My current understanding (which is probably wrong) is that Qt isn't much smaller than Electron itself and I would need to use C++. The animations do not look simple or easy to understand at all, but that's just a first glance.
QtQuick, at first glance, is weird. It uses JS and the animation transitions look pretty close to css transitions.
I guess what I'm looking for here is: how is it a clear win over electron other than just raw speed?
Maybe I'll make a non-simple app in both electron and QtQuick and see how they compare in terms of ease of development, development speed, app size, ram usage and "speed".
Re:Measuring the overhead of WebAssembly using libsodium
by pknopf on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @10:30PM
(#19630637)
You don't need C++ with QML.
https://github.com/qmlnet/qmlnet
I used it at work on my embedded devices.
https://medxchange.com/4klear-all-in-one-camera-recorder/
I highly recommend it. PS: I'm the author.