Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by keytarsolo on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @02:59PM
(#19627722)
I'd be okay with ICANN favouring the people from a place in any of these cases. The idea that American Airlines could own .america or that FC Barcelona could own .barcelona is much weirder than Apple owning .apple or something like that.
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by takeda on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @03:13PM
(#19627834)
That's why allowing anyone with money create their own TLD for a quick buck opened a can of worms.
There was nothing wrong with amazon.com and amazon.travel
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by ryanlol on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @06:13PM
(#19629282)
What's the can of worms here? Why wouldn't amazon.com have exactly the same problem as .amazon?
Re:Nations of the Amazon are seeking “shared governance” of ...
by hannasanarion on Wednesday April 10, 2019 @07:22PM
(#19629653)
Because then everybody is going to want a TLD, which ruins the whole point of a TLD.
I guess I do not see why a company, especially one that already owns <companyName>.com, should find it necessary or feel entitled to register their brand or company name as a gTLD. In cases like this, it seems like the gTLD should be available in a way to reflect the broader meaning of the word.