News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by mistermann on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @11:10AM (#19615421)
Some are "negatively" prejudiced (racists), some are positively prejudiced (~progressives). Very few people in my experience are able to think about this topic in a purely rational and non-emotional manner.
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by wccrawford on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @11:43AM (#19615792)
Is it possible to be "positively prejudiced" against one group without also being "negatively prejudiced" against one or all others?
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by mistermann on Friday April 12, 2019 @01:12PM (#19646828)
I'd say it's possible, I wouldn't say it's very common though - in my opinion the majority of progressives are guilty of hypocrisy in this respect.
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by atomi on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @11:24AM (#19615576)
If everyone was racist we'd be living in apartheid. Frankly, there is no political coalition willing to push apartheid because a plurality of people aren't as racist as some people in this thread seem to think.
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by erikpukinskis on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @12:29PM (#19616355)
What if there was a system that achieved the same effect as apartheid, without requiring an actual apartheid law? Do you think that would be better or worse?
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by atomi on Tuesday April 09, 2019 @12:42PM (#19616507)
Well that's certainly the intent of some bad policies passed under cover. But generally speaking if you shine a light to those policies most people will be against them.
Re:San Francisco’s Slow-Motion Suicide by erikpukinskis on Thursday April 11, 2019 @03:19PM (#19638177)
I concern myself a lot with these kinds of “shadow caste systems”, so I’m intrigued by your faith that they are universally opposed.

I see a lot of people who sort of cultivate a barrier of ignorance because their bread is buttered by the system. They do their job but, only semi-consciously just won’t peer behind the result of their actions.

So I will meditate a little on your position. Maybe I’ve got the wrong bias here.