News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Explaining Sex Rate Changes by magicalhippo on Monday April 08, 2019 @07:12AM (#19604091)
> or insanely forward (sexually)

If you're not after a relationship but to get laid, then that might be a good strategy. Yes you'll get much fewer positive responses but but the false positive rate should be way lower.

Re:Explaining Sex Rate Changes by namarie on Monday April 08, 2019 @09:03AM (#19604778)
But you have to admit it's a lot more risky. Also, plenty of people are looking forward to a good laid but are turned off if you just spam innuendo or are too forward.
Re:Explaining Sex Rate Changes by jamescostian on Monday April 08, 2019 @01:39PM (#19607313)
I suppose if you want to get laid infrequently (or you're attractive enough for bad messages to work) then this is the best solution.
Re:Explaining Sex Rate Changes by JetSpiegel on Monday April 08, 2019 @10:04AM (#19605284)
> If you're not after a relationship but to get laid, then that might be a good strategy.

Why not replace your headshot with a dick pic, in that case?