Nuclear power is the fastest way to slash greenhouse gas emissions, decarbonize

Re:Nuclear power is the fastest way to slash greenhouse gas ... by antt on Sunday April 07, 2019 @03:46AM (#19595415)

I'm from Australia, the only thing that a grid without nuclear or coal has proven is that it can't deal with sustained demand. This year we came perilously close to having to choose which hospitals to cut power to when the there were two 40C days in a row.

If we have a week of that weather Mad Max will be a become a documentary.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclear power is the fastest way to slash greenhouse gas ... by BluSyn on Sunday April 07, 2019 @03:55AM (#19595436)

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/sep/27/south-aus...

This is the solution, but currently only operating at a small scale. This is something that can be scaled up insanely quickly for a fraction the cost of alternatives. The success of this relatively small installation has already resulted in many more battery projects coming online this year.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclear power is the fastest way to slash greenhouse gas ... by antt on Sunday April 07, 2019 @04:01AM (#19595467)

The Tesla battery stores enough energy to run the South Australian grid for 5 minutes and cost 40 million. It's only use is to keep the frequency of the grid from drifting.

This being my day job, it would add $8k to the electricity bill of the two child household in Australia if we used your solution to store the wind and solar power.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclear power is the fastest way to slash greenhouse gas ... by rocqua on Sunday April 07, 2019 @06:02AM (#19595867)

Was it actually renewables slumping in production or demand surging? If the second, how different would the situation have been with traditional power?

I ask because a 40C day sounds like a problem due to AC usage, but would probably come with pretty effective solar, and decent wind near the sea.

[ Parent | on HN ]