Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source
by thrillgore on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @02:20PM
(#19557060)
Does anyone remember his book "A New Kind of Science" which was a really discredited, unoriginal, hack-fraudish, non-scientifically vetted essay on cellular automata?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I own the book, and I enjoyed at least some parts of it. Primitive cellular automata classification also had some scientific merit, and now widely cited. It could be shorter and/or probably better structured as a series of blog posts, but it doesn’t deserve such vitriol, in my opinion.
I remember this book + I own it. It is a very good book but way over my head. (Additionally, it serves well as a doorstop).
Still I admire the amount of diligence and energy that went into this. Wolfram spent several years _obsessed_ with this stuff. See his 2012 blogpost about his "quantified self" recordings: https://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/03/the-personal-analyti...
Maybe A New Kind of Science will create a surge sometime (just like Neural Networks were declared dead for several years, then Deep Learning came along and they took off)
Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source
by titanomachy on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @12:17AM
(#19560684)
This blog post isn't by Stephen Wolfram, it's Jon McLoone.
Still better than anything you or I will ever write.
Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source
by WkndTriathlete on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @08:45AM
(#19562834)
Are you sure he wrote it? Rumor has it that Wolfram had his grad students/postdocs write Mathematica and is essentially trampling on their backs making money off of it now.
Re:Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source
by AnaniasAnanas on Thursday April 04, 2019 @11:10PM
(#19579328)
Wolfram is not some sort of demigod.