Re:I tried creating a web browser, and Google blocked me
by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @12:21PM
(#19555780)
Except that there was no such trade off here. If they refuse to approve DRM and then some browsers unwisely implement it anyway, having their approval makes it worse, not better. The browsers doing the wrong thing can claim to be following a standard, even though the standard is useless garbage because the entire point of having a standard is so that anyone can implement it, which in this case they still can't.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I tried creating a web browser, and Google blocked me
by kbenson on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @12:36PM
(#19555981)
The trade off is in relevancy. If the standards body doesn't force a confrontation it knows it can't win, then it retains some power that it can throw behind or against future proposals. If the major browsers have already decided to completely ignore them and create their own consensus, there's that much less reason to listen to them next time. Not only has a precedent been set, but coordination on features outside the control may have already been somewhat standardized behind the scenes (beyond what they already do), making it easier next time.
The downside is as you say that the browsers can point to the standard as for why they implemented it, but that's why it's a trade off, and not cut and dry (IMO)
Re:I tried creating a web browser, and Google blocked me
by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday April 02, 2019 @12:44PM
(#19556078)
In some sense everything is always a trade off. But some things cost more than they're worth.