How London thieves exploit organisational silos

Re:How London thieves exploit organisational silos by dTal on Sunday March 31, 2019 @07:50PM (#19539270)

I'm not quite sure what your 'no' is specifically in reference to. I'm also not sure what a SPOC is, and I'm not familiar with the details of the process.

But The Guardian reported in 2014 that "EE, Vodafone and Three give police mobile call records at click of a mouse", and in 2015 that "UK police requests to access phone calls or emails are granted 93% of the time", with rejection rates varying wildly by county from as high as 28% to as low as 0.1%. So it doesn't seem to be as hard as you're making out, unless things have changed wildly in the last few years. May I ask your sources?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/10/automatic-poli...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/01/police-request...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How London thieves exploit organisational silos by angry_octet on Monday April 01, 2019 @03:16AM (#19541206)

SPOC = single point of contact

The filtering isn't about civil liberties (although keeping councils out seems sensible) but rate limiting requests via paperwork, so only important ones get done.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How London thieves exploit organisational silos by multjoy on Monday April 01, 2019 @08:21AM (#19542549)

What's your source for that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How London thieves exploit organisational silos by multjoy on Monday April 01, 2019 @08:16AM (#19542526)

I'm a police officer who routinely uses communications data in investigations.

[ Parent | on HN ]