News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lyft prices IPO at top of range by dv_dt on Thursday March 28, 2019 @07:04PM (#19517525)
They put in capital, true, but it wouldn’t be available unless this was the most likely fit for their investment profile, vs say low yield treasuries. The investors are just playing maximization game and have much more security than the lyft founders even if they lose ecery cent.

We lionize the “risk” of VC investors far too much.

Re:Lyft prices IPO at top of range by ryandrake on Thursday March 28, 2019 @11:48PM (#19519009)
Also, let’s get real: VC investors are rich. They were rich before the investment, and they will be rich afterwards, regardless of the outcome. Maybe they will be ultra-rich after an exit, or they’ll be simply super-rich after a failure. Either way, they are already in the “set for life no matter what” category, so really, are they taking that much of a personal risk?
Re:Lyft prices IPO at top of range by dv_dt on Friday March 29, 2019 @12:16AM (#19519120)
That's what I mean, the investors are so rich, it makes complete sense to take a portion of their riches and invest in high risk high reward states where most of the outcomes will be every cent is lost. It's not only set for life type money, but so much money that hiring teams of people to figure out how to even invest the proceeds in a rational way, of which VCs are just one subset of the team (outsourced, insourced, or otherwise).