News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Make Common Lisp go Faster Than C by jcl on Tuesday May 20, 2008 @02:59PM (#195148)
To be fair, the purpose of HN is to serve YC -- that's why we don't see ads on the site. People have suggested not scribd-ing everything before; I can only assume that the reason this has not yet happened is because the feedback we are providing is more valuable to YC than a few upset readers.

And this may well be the case: When most people have problems accessing a web page one way, they won't tell you directly; instead, they'll try to find another way to access it or give up. By providing only one way to read PDFs on a discussion board, you get access to this otherwise invisible negative feedback.

Re:How to Make Common Lisp go Faster Than C by dreish on Tuesday May 20, 2008 @03:12PM (#195164)
Yes, but not every idea turns out to be a good one.

Based on the unanimous jeers every time a PDF submission gets autoconverted, scribd appears not to be one of the good ones. Maybe it's time to try something else.

Re:How to Make Common Lisp go Faster Than C by dbrush on Wednesday May 21, 2008 @06:29AM (#195884)
It isn't unanimous.
Re:How to Make Common Lisp go Faster Than C by fff123 on Tuesday May 20, 2008 @04:46PM (#195297)
> the purpose of HN is to serve YC -- that's why we don't see ads on the site.

We don't see ads because the site is run by millionaires and hardly takes any computing resources or bandwidth.

Re:How to Make Common Lisp go Faster Than C by icey on Tuesday May 20, 2008 @07:25PM (#195443)
I assume you remember how those millionaires got to be that way and what they're doing these days, right?