News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by imtringued on Thursday March 28, 2019 @07:07AM (#19511007)
>expendable, stealthy drones acting as missile trucks

The 70s called and want their cruise missiles back.

The type of weapon you're describing already exist and are widely used. They are commonly launched by missile destroyers, submarines or large bomber aircraft behind the front lines. You still need a manned fighter at the front lines to find targets to shoot at.

Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by poof131 on Thursday March 28, 2019 @10:05AM (#19512274)
“Find targets to shoot at.” The man is hardly involved at all. It’s a battle of sensors. It’s a battle over the electromagnetic spectrum and the man in the loop in the aircraft isn’t the critical part. Unless, you lose the battle of the EM spectrum and can’t communicate with a drone. Then a man in the loop could be critical but you’ve probably already lost at that point and would be better off with the “cruise missiles” you deride using ground mapping to find the way to the area and AI for specific target selection. I’m talking more about what aircraft are these days in BVR air-to-air: missile trucks, carrying AAMRAM, which is the real weapon. I’ve flown against F-22s, seen their weaknesses, and wouldn’t base our defense strategy on planes that have become too expensive compared to missiles.
Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by rbanffy on Thursday March 28, 2019 @11:06AM (#19512883)
Sure, but one pilot assigning targets to dozens of drones that are just outside the enemy controlled area waiting for instructions can go a long way towards making the pilot extremely effective.

That pilot can also be replaced by, say, 200 kilograms of extra sensors and communication equipment and two or three people in a container in the nearest airbase.

Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by JohnBooty on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:22AM (#19511449)
> manned fighter at the front lines

Why a manned fighter? Why not remotely-human-piloted drones?