News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Software Won’t Fix Boeing’s ‘Faulty’ Airframe by Gibbon1 on Thursday March 28, 2019 @04:08AM (#19510253)
You can have cables, push rods, hydraulics, power assisted hydraulics, full hydraulic, and electrical actuators. As long as their control inputs are only from the pilot they are identical in every way but their failure modes.

There is big big difference between FBW and the aircraft generating control inputs on it's own. Boeing aircraft had two modes, 'manual' and 'auto pilot' The 737 MAX adds a third case, 'sometimes'

Boeing never told the pilots about the 'sometimes' part. And never told them that 'sometimes' has ultimately more control authority than they do.

Re:Software Won’t Fix Boeing’s ‘Faulty’ Airframe by dingaling on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:16PM (#19513629)
I think you misunderstood my post. There is literally NO manual command over control surfaces in any current Boeing airliner other than the 737 variants. Neither the 777 nor 787 have any pushrods or cables.

The Max does indeed have a hybrid approach ( manual actuation, FBW spoilers, mystery MCAS ) but that's not Boeing's current philosophy.

Re:Software Won’t Fix Boeing’s ‘Faulty’ Airframe by Gibbon1 on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:21PM (#19513670)
You're willfully failing to get my point.