[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_exchange_market
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/268750/global-gross-dome...
They are two separate use cases, and so far not that many people are using cryptocurrencies for payments. Even if the payments use case were to grow, I believe that the trading/speculation would grow even more, so the payments use case will keep being a small percentage, at least for the short and medium term.
The statement that the rest is speculation is, in itself, pure speculation.
We don't know how to separate speculation from non-speculation. One could easily argue that the payments to merchants is no less speculative than payments to exchanges (what does it matter if you sell your Bitcoin for a carpet or for dollars?).
There's also the fact that most speculation probably never sees the blockchain. They are simply contracts somewhere or entries in Coinbase's database.
Chainalysis reckons that Bitcoin accounted for around $812bn of genuine transfers of value.
Of that, Ms Grauer reckons, only a fraction was used to buy things. Around $2.4bn went to merchant-service providers, which handle payments for businesses—a piffling sum compared with the $17trn of transactions such as Alipay and WeChat Pay, two Chinese payment apps, in 2017. Darknet markets, which sell stolen credit-card details, recreational drugs, cheap medicines and the like, made up $605m, and gambling sites $857m. Most of the rest was related to speculation.
Is this saying that less than 1% of all "genuine transfers of value" in Bitcoin are for goods and services other than speculation?