Teeny-Tiny Bluetooth Transmitter Runs on Less Than 1 Milliwatt

Re:Teeny-Tiny Bluetooth Transmitter Runs on Less Than 1 Mill... by comboy on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @12:47PM (#19502840)

This is quintessence of a typical discussion on the Internet. Context matters and it's expensive to gather appropriate context. Usually it's not as simple to explain as in this case.

"I don't have to read further because I know for a fact that <this bit> is bullshit". It's a fair heuristic. It's just that it is so difficult to have a deeper meaningful discussion without some trust established first (so that you know you're not wasting your time).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Teeny-Tiny Bluetooth Transmitter Runs on Less Than 1 Mill... by quietriot on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @12:58PM (#19502985)

As a ham with an Extra class license I'm understanding that it was a type of antenna and am now regretting this commentary but for just a moment wondered if it was an April fools page published early.

I do have an interest in magnetic antennas (antennas in general) and also appreciate the paper listed by tzs. Thank you tzs!

Sorry for dropping the SNR in here :)

[ Parent | on HN ]