It's not an interpretation of stoicism, it's an observation about the convenience of stoicism to a certain kind of self-interest--much like Reddit's supposed commitment to freedom of speech also happens to be a much cheaper option than thorough and effective site-wide moderation.

Except stoicism doesn't say what the article claims it does, so maybe it's about the convenience of a corruption of stoicism.

Kind of how the "prosperity gospel" is a very convenient form of Christianity to have if you're wealthy, even though it seems in opposition to the general interpretation of the teachings of Jesus. You can't blame Jesus for people thinking their wealth is sanctioned by God just because people adhere to the prosperity gospel.

Convincing employees that hard work is a source of pride is the oldest trick in the book. See:

https://mashable.com/2017/06/05/you-are-a-doer-gig-economy/

Yep agree. It is annoying when people who don't understand Stoicism think and talks as if they do.