News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @08:28AM (#19491097)
To what degree has Britain's waning influence contributed to this? London was historically Europe's most competent commercially-minded city. I'm hopeful to see a counterbalance emerge in Frankfurt or Paris, but the writing on the wall indicates that's unlikely.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by DanBC on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @08:34AM (#19491148)
What makes you think the UK is against stupid copyright measures?

It's currently unlawful to format-shift (eg, rip CD to MP3) in England, so it's unlikely we'd have put up much argument against this.

Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by jackweirdy on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:00AM (#19491342)
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by madjam002 on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:17AM (#19491479)
That’s an outdated article, it has since been made illegal again.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by cift on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:50AM (#19491769)
Not quite true

> Under the new regulations, only the individual who purchased the original copy of the work, and not others such as a friend or family, is legally allowed to copy it.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/17/high-court-q...

Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by DanBC on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @10:13AM (#19492000)
Those are the new regulations that were stopped by this court case.

The government said that this type of copying would have minimal impact on the rights-holders. Those rights holders disagreed, went to court, and won, and so now format shifting is not legal.

The court case is here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2015/1723.html

It's long and complex. The first few paras are a good introduction.

EDIT:Genuinely baffled that this link to a primary source has been downvoted.

Currently, because of this case it's not lawful to format shift. I'm not saying that I think this is a good thing; I'm describing the law as it is in England.

Using the Guardian sources linked above:

> The high court has quashed regulations introduced by the government to allow members of the public to lawfully copy CDs and other copyright material bought for their own private use.

[...]

> On Friday, in a further decision, he said: “It is clear that I should quash the regulations. I make clear this covers the entirety of the regulations and all the rights and obligations contained therein.”

[...]

> The changes had come into force last October under the Copyright and Rights in Performances (Personal Copies for Private Use) Regulations 2014. Prior to 1 October, it was unlawful, for example, to “rip” or copy the contents of a CD on to a laptop, smartphone or MP3 player for personal use, although the format-shifting activity had become commonplace. The regulations introduced an exception into UK copyright law permitting the making of personal copies, as long as they were only for private use.

The law said format shifting was unlawful. The government introduced regulations to make format shifting lawful, but they didn't include mechanism to pay the rights holders. The judge ruled against the government, those new regulations were quashed, and format shifting became unlawful again.

Here's what the judge said: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2015/2041.html

Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by rcxdude on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:35AM (#19491620)
The UK in general will support such increases in copyright power. The government for the most part is not tech-savvy enough to understand the objections to article 13.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by raverbashing on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:28AM (#19491558)
Well, Farage voted against this crap. Which should be a shame to the other MEPs but apparently not.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by rcxdude on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:33AM (#19491599)
This is UKIP's stopped clock being right once a day, they just vote against anything in the EU. They would support a worse version of the bill locally.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by raverbashing on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @09:39AM (#19491660)
Yeah, it could be, but then why the other EurSkep. parties voted for it?
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by tremon on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @10:41AM (#19492273)
Of the 34 EFDD votes, only 6 voted for. Which other EurSkep parties are you referring to?
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform by raverbashing on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @11:46AM (#19492878)