Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform
by rvense on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @08:25AM
(#19491077)
I think there is a feeling that this law was largely authored by/for narrow (commercial) interests in the entertainment industry, with little to no regard for its consequences for other parts of the web like open discussion forums and projects such as Wikipedia.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform
by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @08:27AM
(#19491096)
The tech industry are also major lobbyists, who often spend more on influencing politicians in their favor than the entertainment industry does. Commercial interests were on both sides, as much as they'd like you to believe it was a valiant fight of the little guys to save the Internet.
Re:European Parliament approves copyright reform
by black_puppydog on Tuesday March 26, 2019 @08:38AM
(#19491169)
hard to argue that, given the actual in-person turnout at protests, and the role that EDRI and other NGOs played. Those involved there have been very active, and very public, for a long time. Julia Reda is one of them, but maybe also google Thomas Lohninger.
Of course google/fb etc had a stake in this and were lobbying. They're not the ones who stand to lose from this outcome though, even if that's what the Axel Voss & team would like to believe.