News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GNU Nano 4.0. Parent comment

Re:GNU Nano 4.0 by spudlyo on Sunday March 24, 2019 @01:45PM (#19477615)
If I want a light version of emacs (like on OpenWRT, or a constrained embedded device) I reach for JOVE, or Jonathan's Own Version of Emacs. JOVE was actually the version of emacs I first learned on back in the late 80s.

JOVE is tiny, and has implemented a huge amount of emacs. After you spend 15 minutes or so tweaking your .joverc file you won't even notice it's not GNU.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 4.0 by dehrmann on Sunday March 24, 2019 @02:53PM (#19478040)
When I'm not using an IDE, I'm a vi user because it's always there. When my /usr on FreeBSD has issues, vi is in /bin. OpenWrt ships with vi. I honestly have no idea if Emacs is any better, but not being a default makes it a non-starter for me.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 4.0 by h1d on Monday March 25, 2019 @01:19AM (#19480445)
Do you really have that many occasions to work in an environment where you can't ask for/install a package?

Limiting yourself for such rare occasions just sounds wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GNU Nano 4.0 by dsq on Monday March 25, 2019 @08:41AM (#19481966)
Production corporate environments are often firewalled/locked down. To change anything you have to go through layers of dis/approval. You are generally stuck with the defaults till the end of time.
[ Parent | on HN ]